The Braves’ Core 9 Strategy: How $31M Contracts Create Champions

0
Image: ATL Braves Country

Baseball execs still can’t believe it. Ronald Acuña Jr., the walking highlight reel who fills seats and stat sheets alike, earned approximately $17 million in 2023 while producing value worth around $35 million according to Fangraphs’ WAR valuation. That’s not just good accounting—it’s financial wizardry that would make Jordan Belfort from “The Wolf of Wall Street” blush. Atlanta’s front office, through their innovative roster strategy, has effectively hacked baseball’s economic system, turning conventional team-building wisdom on its head.

This bargain-hunting approach extends beyond Acuña. The Braves identified, developed, and locked down a championship core with contracts that look similar to finding a PlayStation 5 in the clearance bin. While other franchises throw nine-figure deals at established stars as if playing fantasy baseball with house money, Atlanta plays chess when everyone else plays checkers. The result: a sustainable dynasty with six straight division titles, a World Series ring, and a financial flexibility that keeps fans flooding through the gates while keeping ownership’s accountants surprisingly relaxed.

9. Spotting Stars Before They Twinkle

Image NARA DVIDS

The Braves’ scouting department operates with remarkable foresight. Their international scouting identified Acuña at age 16 before signing him to a modest bonus. This talent identification happens years before other teams even notice these players, with Atlanta’s evaluators using a blend of traditional scouting and advanced metrics that make “Moneyball” look positively ancient.

Baseball development resembles gardening in a hurricane—unpredictable and messy. But Atlanta’s scouts don’t just identify raw talent; they specifically target players with developmental profiles matching their coaching system. They evaluate not just what a player is, but what a player could become after marinating in the Braves’ development program. The organization emphasizes high-ceiling prospects over high-floor safety picks, banking on their ability to transform potential into production. This approach creates a constant conveyor belt of cost-controlled talent that allows the front office to budget with remarkable precision.

8. Finishing School for Future Stars

© Sam Navarro Imagn Images

The Braves don’t just draft differently—they develop differently. Their minor league system operates less like a traditional baseball assembly line and more like a specialized workshop where each prospect receives individualized attention. Acuña spent three seasons in this developmental crucible, receiving tailored coaching that refined his natural gifts into MVP-caliber skills. The patience shown makes helicopter parents look positively hands-off.

Atlanta approaches player development with methodical precision. Their minor league coaches use TrackMan, VR tools, and psychology programs that transform raw athletes into polished big leaguers. Most organizations talk about development; the Braves execute it with remarkable consistency. Their minor league system doesn’t just teach baseball skills—it cultivates baseball intelligence, helping players understand the why behind the how. When prospects finally emerge in Atlanta, they arrive fully formed, ready to contribute immediately, and—crucially—years away from expensive arbitration.

7. Locking Down the Future

© Brett Davis Imagn Images

Contract extensions form the cornerstone of Atlanta’s financial strategy, operating with ruthless efficiency before players reach peak earning potential. Ozzie Albies signed for seven years and $35 million in 2019—a deal so team-friendly it should come with a thank-you note. Austin Riley committed for ten years at $212 million, Michael Harris for eight years at $72 million, and Spencer Strider for six years at $75 million. These deals look similar to buying Apple stock in 1997.

The beauty of these extensions isn’t just their below-market rates—it’s the timing. Atlanta identifies their core players early and presents extensions before players have fully established their market value. The team trades higher short-term salaries for much lower long-term commitments, avoiding the free agency meat market altogether. Based on WAR cost efficiency models from Baseball Prospectus, this approach costs roughly 40% less per win than traditional free-agent team building, creating financial flexibility that allows Atlanta to weather injuries, make strategic additions, and maintain competitive balance without reaching luxury tax thresholds that make other owners break out in cold sweats.

6. The Trophy Case Doesn’t Lie

© Brett Davis Imagn Images

Six straight division titles tell no lies. Twenty-three playoff wins and a World Series trophy shine brightly. The Braves have transformed from perennial contenders to modern dynasty while maintaining just the sixth-highest payroll in baseball—a feat as impressive as pulling off a perfect heist in an “Ocean’s Eleven” movie. Their strategy has delivered consistent excellence without breaking the bank.

The front office shows the same shrewdness in midstream adjustments. When Freddie Freeman departed, they immediately acquired Matt Olson on March 14, 2022, and extended him within 24 hours. These decisive moves prevent the organizational drift that plagues less disciplined franchises. The business impacts prove equally impressive—Atlanta ranked third in MLB attendance in 2023 despite competing in what Nielsen ranks as approximately the 10th largest market. Fans recognize and support sustainable excellence, rewarding ownership’s commitment to building properly rather than splashing cash for headlines. The results speak volumes about the validity of their approach.

5. When Copying Goes Wrong

© Darren Yamashita Imagn Images

The Red Sox attempted to replicate Atlanta’s blueprint following their 2018 championship, rebuilding their farm system and targeting early extensions for key players. They replaced Xander Bogaerts with Trevor Story, mirroring Atlanta’s Freeman-to-Olson transition. Boston even handed Ceddanne Rafaela an eight-year, $50 million contract similar to deals Atlanta has offered their young players. The strategy shift became apparent through their organizational moves.

Yet Boston’s implementation resembles a bad movie remake—same basic plot but none of the magic that made the original special. Their organizational direction changes with New England weather patterns, undermining the stability required for long-term player development. Leadership shifts create philosophical whiplash throughout the organization. The Red Sox failed to recognize that the Braves’ success isn’t just about the strategy but the organizational discipline to execute it consistently. Rafael Devers’ frustration with the team’s direction serves as a public testament to their struggles. Copying the notes without understanding the music rarely produces a hit.

4. Small Market, Big Dreams

© Charles LeClaire Imagn Images

Pittsburgh represents the ultimate test case for the Braves model. Operating with resources that make Atlanta look similar to the Yankees by comparison, the Pirates have embraced the blueprint with surprising commitment. After last making the playoffs in 2015, they’ve systematically rebuilt through drafting Mitch Keller in 2014, Ke’Bryan Hayes in 2015, and acquiring O’Neil Cruz to add thump to their developing core.

The Pirates followed Atlanta’s extension playbook with unexpected boldness, securing Hayes for $70 million over eight years and signing Bryan Reynolds to an eight-year, $106 million deal—the largest contract in franchise history. This systematic approach resembles the methodical planning of Danny Ocean assembling his crew for the perfect casino heist. Their resourcefulness demonstrates how even the most financially constrained organizations can adapt the Braves’ principles. While Pittsburgh hasn’t yet achieved Atlanta’s results, their strategic alignment represents perhaps the purest adaptation of the model, albeit with a significantly smaller margin for error.

3. Tale of Two Third Basemen

© Nick Turchiaro Imagn Images

The contrast between Rafael Devers and Austin Riley perfectly illustrates different philosophical approaches to roster construction. Devers commands $331 million over eleven years with Boston, netting approximately $31 million annually. Riley earns $212 million over ten years with Atlanta, averaging just $21 million yearly—despite comparable offensive production and superior defense. The $10 million annual difference would pay for an entire mid-rotation starter.

Riley’s deal stands as baseball’s greatest bargain, generating substantial surplus value throughout its duration—similar to finding a vintage Honus Wagner card at a garage sale. His extension exemplifies Atlanta’s philosophy of identifying core talent early, extending them before market forces drive prices skyward, and building organizational stability through cost certainty. Meanwhile, Devers’ contract reflects traditional market-driven valuation, paying full retail for established production. The contrast couldn’t be clearer: one organization builds value through development and timing, the other acquires it at peak market prices. Both players deliver excellence, but one contract provides significantly more financial flexibility.

2. The Free Agency Trap

© David Frerker Imagn Images

Free agency promises instant gratification but delivers buyer’s remorse with alarming frequency. The Padres committed approximately $800-900 million in the 2022-2023 window through contracts for Soto, Bogaerts, Darvish, and Machado—yet watched October baseball from home. The 2022 Mets assembled a record payroll that reached approximately $355 million with luxury tax in 2023, earning disappointment rather than championships. These cautionary tales highlight why Atlanta’s approach avoids the free agent casino where the house always wins in the end.

The problems extend beyond financial inefficiency. Free agent acquisitions often struggle with integration, creating chemistry issues that ripple throughout rosters. Think of the 2011 Philadelphia “Dream Team” Eagles—a collection of expensive parts that never formed a cohesive whole. Underperforming players with guaranteed contracts create roster flexibility problems for years. Jordan Montgomery’s last-minute signing just days before the 2023 season highlights the unpredictability of the free agent market. The Braves instead focus on known commodities developed in-house, creating an environment where players understand the organizational culture and expectations before signing their first extension.

1. The Future Remains Bright

© Nathan Ray Seebeck Imagn Images

The 2024 Braves stand at 11-5, leading their division and showing no signs of organizational fatigue. Their nine major extensions since 2019, including Chris Sale this past offseason, demonstrate unwavering commitment to their philosophy. Despite consistent success, Atlanta maintains just the sixth-highest payroll in MLB—evidence of their continued financial discipline even as revenues increase. Their approach resembles the sustainable business model from “The Social Network” rather than the boom-bust cycle that plagues most sports franchises.

Max Fried’s free agency after the 2024 season looms as an interesting test case for the limits of their extension philosophy. Not every homegrown star will sign below market value, creating inevitable roster churn. However, the Braves have positioned themselves to absorb these departures through continued player development. Their disciplined approach has created a sustainable competitive model that should weather the increasing challenges in an increasingly competitive National League. While other organizations chase quick fixes through free agency, Atlanta continues building from within, demonstrating that in baseball—as in most worthwhile endeavors—there are no shortcuts to lasting success.

author avatar
Spencer Rickles Writer
Spencer Rickles was born and raised in Atlanta and has followed the Braves closely for the last 25 years, going to many games every season since he was a child.